The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is facing mounting criticism due to its aggressive stance on regulating the crypto sector. Paradigm, a Web3 venture capital firm, recently published a policy piece about the problems with SEC's registration policies. In this piece, Paradgm notes that the SEC does not provide crypto asset users and investors with the necessary information and that the current disclosure policy was developed in the 1930s before the emergence of the Internet. Additionally, crypto assets can be traded peer-to-peer and through the use of a different technology stack than those used in the traditional securities markets. To face the challenge of incorporating new asset classes such as cryptocurrencies, Paradigm believes that the SEC should modify its current disclosure regime to fit the current market needs.

Other representatives from the crypto sector, such as Congressman Warren Davidson, have also been critical of the SEC's policies and recently introduced legislation that aims to replace Gary Gensler (SEC's current chairman). In an April 18 hearing on theSEC's oversight Gensler was asked if Ether could be classified as both a commodity and a security. He avoided any definitive response.

The situation that the crypto industry is currently facing is one of uncertainty as the SEC is still reluctant to provide clear answers on how to operate within the regulatory boundaries. In a timespan of only a couple of months, the agency has launched multiple enforcement actions against non-compliant crypto companies. At the same time, subtle comments from SEC representatives have been leaving questions on how to view certain crypto assets such as Ether and whether it should be viewed as a commodity or a security. It is clear that the agency's stance on crypto is not lenient and investors should follow the regulatory guidelines to remain compliant.



Other News from Today