CandleFocus Glossary Editor.png)
The General Agreements to Borrow (GAB) was an international lending program set forth in 1962 by the G-10 countries and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The program was designed to provide a flexible source of funding to assist developing countries that found themselves in economic difficulty.
The IMF was the lender of record, but the G-10 countries – Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom among them – agreed to provide collateral and deposits which would fund the program. These funds were made available for individual nations to access in the form of loans, grants and other assistance.
Once a nation secured assistance, it was obligated to adhere to certain conditions. These conditions included:
-Restructuring of the nation’s economy and financial system; -Reduction of external debt through refinancing, rescheduling and debt relief; -Support of domestic economic initiatives, such as privatisation and market liberalisation; and -Improvement of the nation’s foreign exchange and balance of payments position.
The funds sourced through the GAB program were usually reserved for countries in certain circumstances. These included:
-Countries facing significant balance of payments difficulties; -Countries with significant payments arrears and no prospects of obtaining financing from elsewhere; -Countries with significant repayments to the IMF due in the near future; -Countries facing food and other types of crisis.
The GAB program was seen as a major success in it’s day, providing a much-needed liquidity boost for nations that found themselves in difficult economic straits. Over time, however, it was clear that the GAB program had become increasingly ineffective. This became particularly apparent when the global financial crisis hit in 2008 and led to more widespread financial instability.
As a result, the G-10 countries agreed to allow the program to lapse at the end of 2018. It was replaced by the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB), which became the primary fundraising facility for the IMF. In comparison to the GAB program, the NAB is much better suited to the global economic conditions of today.
The NAB offers much more specific conditions and is better tailored to the particular needs of nations experiencing economic distress. It also allows for more effective monitoring and evaluation of economic conditions as well as greater flexibility in the timing and structure of funding disbursements.
The General Agreements to Borrow was a highly effective program that provided essential liquidity to many nations in economic trouble. However, as conditions have changed, the GAB has become less suitable to global economic conditions. The advent of the New Arrangements to Borrow offers an opportunity for the IMF to provide stronger and more effective aid to nations in distress.
The IMF was the lender of record, but the G-10 countries – Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United Kingdom among them – agreed to provide collateral and deposits which would fund the program. These funds were made available for individual nations to access in the form of loans, grants and other assistance.
Once a nation secured assistance, it was obligated to adhere to certain conditions. These conditions included:
-Restructuring of the nation’s economy and financial system; -Reduction of external debt through refinancing, rescheduling and debt relief; -Support of domestic economic initiatives, such as privatisation and market liberalisation; and -Improvement of the nation’s foreign exchange and balance of payments position.
The funds sourced through the GAB program were usually reserved for countries in certain circumstances. These included:
-Countries facing significant balance of payments difficulties; -Countries with significant payments arrears and no prospects of obtaining financing from elsewhere; -Countries with significant repayments to the IMF due in the near future; -Countries facing food and other types of crisis.
The GAB program was seen as a major success in it’s day, providing a much-needed liquidity boost for nations that found themselves in difficult economic straits. Over time, however, it was clear that the GAB program had become increasingly ineffective. This became particularly apparent when the global financial crisis hit in 2008 and led to more widespread financial instability.
As a result, the G-10 countries agreed to allow the program to lapse at the end of 2018. It was replaced by the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB), which became the primary fundraising facility for the IMF. In comparison to the GAB program, the NAB is much better suited to the global economic conditions of today.
The NAB offers much more specific conditions and is better tailored to the particular needs of nations experiencing economic distress. It also allows for more effective monitoring and evaluation of economic conditions as well as greater flexibility in the timing and structure of funding disbursements.
The General Agreements to Borrow was a highly effective program that provided essential liquidity to many nations in economic trouble. However, as conditions have changed, the GAB has become less suitable to global economic conditions. The advent of the New Arrangements to Borrow offers an opportunity for the IMF to provide stronger and more effective aid to nations in distress.