Micromanagement is a style of corporate management that focuses intensely on the performance of individual workers, teams and tasks. It is often thought of as the antithesis of a hands-off approach, where managers are actively involved with every decision, task, and action taken by those under their supervision.
At its worst, micromanagement can be stifling and oppressive. Micromanagers are overly intrusive and demanding, set impossible standards, and focus on the most minute details rather than the bigger picture. By keeping their staff under a microscope, they can quickly create a tense, hostile work environment and negatively affect employee morale.
It is usually assumed that micromanagers are poor communicators and have unrealistic expectations from those they manage. More often than not, however, micromanagement is simply a result of a lack of confidence or a desire for control. These managers may be eager to get the job done, but unclear on how to properly delegate.
Fortunately, there are steps micromanagers can take to adopt a more holistic, macro approach. As a manager, it's important to have regular conversations with your team to assess their workload and goals, openly address any issues and foster an open, supportive environment. Rather than micromanaging, it's better to focus on results, allow employees some autonomy and trust them to do their best work.
The challenge with micromanagement is recognizing when it's happening. Red flags include frequent and compulsive checking-in, micromanaging minor details and not giving employees enough credit when they do something right. If you find yourself over-managing your staff unnecessarily, take a step back and refocus your efforts on the larger organizational dynamics.
By adopting a more macro approach to management, you can foster a positive and empowering workplace that values employee input and encourages initiative. With the right attitude and proper training, you can move away from micromanagement and reap the many advantages of a productive and engaged workforce.
At its worst, micromanagement can be stifling and oppressive. Micromanagers are overly intrusive and demanding, set impossible standards, and focus on the most minute details rather than the bigger picture. By keeping their staff under a microscope, they can quickly create a tense, hostile work environment and negatively affect employee morale.
It is usually assumed that micromanagers are poor communicators and have unrealistic expectations from those they manage. More often than not, however, micromanagement is simply a result of a lack of confidence or a desire for control. These managers may be eager to get the job done, but unclear on how to properly delegate.
Fortunately, there are steps micromanagers can take to adopt a more holistic, macro approach. As a manager, it's important to have regular conversations with your team to assess their workload and goals, openly address any issues and foster an open, supportive environment. Rather than micromanaging, it's better to focus on results, allow employees some autonomy and trust them to do their best work.
The challenge with micromanagement is recognizing when it's happening. Red flags include frequent and compulsive checking-in, micromanaging minor details and not giving employees enough credit when they do something right. If you find yourself over-managing your staff unnecessarily, take a step back and refocus your efforts on the larger organizational dynamics.
By adopting a more macro approach to management, you can foster a positive and empowering workplace that values employee input and encourages initiative. With the right attitude and proper training, you can move away from micromanagement and reap the many advantages of a productive and engaged workforce.